top of page

Nanotyrannus, meaning 'dwarf tyrant', was a genus

of 5-metre long Late Cretaceous Tyrannosaur. Known from only two specimens. There is a large scientific debate as to whether this species was in fact a small Tyrannosaurs Rex or a seperate subspecies all on its own. The tooth fossils are differentiated from the Tyrannosaurus Rex by the shape of the root as well as the number of serrations.


This speciment measures in at 44mm with fantastic serrations, a lovely ivory color and no repair. Fully authentic and shown just as it was found this is a great addition to any collection and a wonderful piece of controversial science. 


Nanotyrannus is based on 7541, a skull collected in 1942 by David Hosbrook Dunkle and described by Charles W. Gilmore in 1946, who classified it as a new species in the tyrannosaur genus Gorgosaurus as G. lancensis. In 1988, the specimen was re-described by Robert T. Bakker, Phil Currie and Michael Williams, then the curator of paleontology at the Cleveland Museum of Ntural History, where the original specimen was housed and is currently on display. Their initial research indicated that the skull bones were fused, and that it therefore represented an adult specimen. In light of this, Bakker and colleagues assigned the skull to a new genus, named Nanotyrannus for its apparently small adult size. The specimen is estimated to have been around 5.2 metres (17 ft) long when it died. However, a detailed analysis of the specimen by Thomas Carr in 1999 showed that the specimen was in fact a juvenile, leading Carr and many other paleontologists to consider it a juvenile specimen of Tyrannosaurus rex.

In 2001, a more complete juvenile tyrannosaur (nicknamed "Jane", catalogue number BMRP 2002.4.1), belonging to the same species as the original Nanotyrannus specimen, was uncovered. This discovery prompted a conference on tyrannosaurs focused on the issues of Nanotyrannus validity, held at the Burpee Museum Natural History in 2005. Several paleontologists who had previously published opinions that N. lancensis was a valid species, including Currie and Williams, saw the discovery of "Jane" as a confirmation that Nanotyrannus was in fact a juvenile T. rex. On the other hand, some, such as Peter Larson, continued to support the hypothesis that Nanotyrannus lancensis was a separate but closely related species.

The actual scientific study of "Jane", set to be published by Bakker, Larson, and Currie, may help determine whether Nanotyrannus is a valid genus, whether it simply represents a juvenile T. rex, or whether it is a new species of a previously identified genus of tyrannosaurus.

1.75" Nanotyrannus Tooth

    bottom of page